← Search

DeEtte Mountford

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
South Pasadena, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
16 matches · 9W–7L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history16 matches
L
2026-03-18 · CV-Rancho La Quinta/P Taylor · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Janice Campbell
loading the estimate
6-7, 3-6
L
2025-02-19 · CV-Rancho La Quinta/Patti Taylor & Sue Parker · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Christine Querrey
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 3-6, 0-1
L
2025-02-12 · CV-Rancho La Quinta/Patti Taylor & Sue Parker · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Christine Querrey
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 4-6
L
2025-01-22 · CV-Rancho La Quinta/Patti Taylor & Sue Parker · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Christine Querrey
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-7, 0-1
W
2024-02-21 · CV-Rancho La Quinta/P Taylor · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Christine Querrey
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-3
L
2024-02-14 · CV-Rancho La Quinta/P Taylor · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Connie Masciorini
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 0-6
W
2024-01-31 · CV-Rancho La Quinta/P Taylor · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Christine Querrey
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 7-6
W
2024-01-10 · CV-Rancho La Quinta/P Taylor · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Christine Querrey
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2023-02-15 · CV-Rancho La Quinta/Anne Medzegian · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Christine Querrey
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2023-01-11 · CV-Rancho La Quinta/Anne Medzegian · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Christine Querrey
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-2
L
2022-02-16 · CV-Rancho La Quinta/Knode & Medzegian · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Susan Parker
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 3-6
W
2022-02-09 · CV-Rancho La Quinta/Knode & Medzegian · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Christine Querrey
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 level played
8.0
56.2%
9W–7L · 53.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 63% of the time
#1 Doubles
63%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
3 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer