← Search

Joe Langlois

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Severna Park, MD
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
70 matches · 28W–42L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history70 matches
L
2026-06-03 · Bloomquist · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Wyche
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-06-21 · Bloomquist · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Greg Critcher
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 1-6
L
2025-06-12 · Bloomquist · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kenny Martin
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 0-6
L
2025-03-30 · Rothstein · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Victoria Ehly mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2025-03-16 · Rothstein · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Victoria Ehly mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-02-02 · Rothstein · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Victoria Ehly mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L
2024-08-17 · Ship of Fools · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joshua Fretz championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 0-6
L
Amir Moinfar / David Todd
2024-08-16 · Ship of Fools · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with JD Zachry championship
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
W
2024-07-29 · Bloomquist · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Ponder
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2024-07-23 · Bloomquist · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Greg Critcher
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L
2024-07-15 · Bloomquist · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Greg Critcher
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2024-07-10 · Bloomquist · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Witting
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
12.5%
1W–7L · 27.1% of games
8.0
50%
10W–10L · 51.7% of games
7.0mixed
50%
9W–9L · 54.4% of games
8.0mixed
33.3%
8W–16L · 47.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 53% of the time
#2 Doubles
53%
37 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
16 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer