← Search

Sara Vance

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Owings, MD
4.0A year-end 2024
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
89 matches · 38W–51L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history89 matches
L
2026-07-02 · 55NetChix · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joan Ferrell
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-02 · 55NetChix · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tammy Bowie
loading the estimate
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-02 · 55NetChix · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Susan Maier
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
W
2025-07-05 · 55NetChix · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lisa Scott
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2025-06-05 · 55NetChix · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Susanne Mendiola
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2024-10-24 · Romanek · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ashly Blair
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-6
L
2024-10-22 · Romanek · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Megan Gladwell
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 7-5, 0-1
L
2024-10-15 · Romanek · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ashly Blair
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
L
2024-10-10 · Romanek · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Maureen Cook
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
W
2024-10-01 · Romanek · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cindi Hodskins
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-3
L
2024-09-19 · Romanek · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Maria Birnkammer
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2024-07-08 · Racquettes · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lynn Hoffman
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 39.5% of games
4.0
55%
22W–18L · 52.4% of games
7.0
25%
1W–3L · 49.4% of games
7.5
33.3%
5W–10L · 42.5% of games
8.0
77.8%
7W–2L · 59.3% of games
4.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
10%
1W–9L · 41.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
34 matches
#3 Doubles
34%
30 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
25 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams