← Search

Sandra Curtis

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
La Plata, MD
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
40 matches · 17W–23L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history40 matches
W
2025-07-15 · Volley Girls · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Alpert
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-3
L
2025-07-03 · Volley Girls · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karolyn Clarke
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2025-06-12 · Volley Girls · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dannielle Freeman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-5
W
2025-06-05 · Volley Girls · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karolyn Clarke
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 7-5
L
2024-07-10 · Casey · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Trudy McFall
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2024-07-08 · Curtis · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diana Heinze
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
L
2024-06-04 · Casey · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Julia Wolf
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2024-05-30 · Curtis · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brandie Sparr
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
L
2024-05-29 · Casey · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Julia Wolf
loading the estimate
6-3, 5-7, 0-1
L
2023-11-02 · Team Opponent · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hannah Bulynko
loading the estimate
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2023-10-24 · Team Opponent · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Theresa Remington
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
L
2023-10-17 · Team Opponent · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Catherine Wynne
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
25%
2W–6L · 40.3% of games
6.0
28.6%
2W–5L · 45.1% of games
7.0
52%
13W–12L · 48.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 55% of the time
#3 Doubles
55%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
12 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer