← Search

Diana McKinney

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Peoria, IL
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
61 matches · 25W–36L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history61 matches
L
2026-08-21 · MSIL A55&O 7.0W Chelikas-Pekin · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shari Windsor
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-07 · MSIL A55&O 7.0W Chelikas-Pekin · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shari Windsor
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-16 · MSIL A55&O 7.0W Chelikas-Pekin · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kris Wertz
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-10 · MSIL A55&O 7.0W Chelikas-Pekin · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Roberta Kendzierski
loading the estimate
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
2025-02-21 · MSIL 6.5W Combo Naschert-Pekin · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Susan Naschert
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-02-14 · MSIL 6.5W Combo Naschert-Pekin · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sue Chelikas
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-01-31 · MSIL 6.5W Combo Naschert-Pekin · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kara Knepp
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2024-09-06 · MSIL A55&O 7.0W Chelikas-Pekin · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Laurie Whitmore
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-1
W
2024-07-18 · MSIL A55&O 7.0W Chelikas-Pekin · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Letitia Spirek-Algrain
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-4
L
2024-07-11 · MSIL A55&O 7.0W Chelikas-Pekin · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Connie Julien
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
W
2024-06-28 · MSIL A55&O 7.0W Chelikas-Pekin · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Letitia Spirek-Algrain
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 7-5
W
2023-10-29 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sue Chelikas championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
40%
10W–15L · 47.2% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0
46.9%
15W–17L · 50.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 46% of the time
#3 Doubles
46%
28 matches
#2 Doubles
43%
26 matches
#1 Doubles
12%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal