Search

Sherrill Hilliard

Roy, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
110 matches · 53W–57L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.24
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 4 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
100%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
WA · 3.5
759 of 1209

Sherrill is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Sherrill has been 3.5 for all 5 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

3.03.520192020202120232025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Sherrill has gone from the 71st to the 35th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.5
55.6%
20W–16L · 50% of games
4.0
0%
0W–4L · 36.1% of games
7.0
54.9%
28W–23L · 54.4% of games
8.0
0%
0W–8L · 30% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history110 matches
W
N/A
2025-12-06 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lee Bowman
0.003better than expected — took 100% of games against 84% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
2025-10-11 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Wendy Clarke
0.017below expectation — took 53% of games against 60% expected
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2025-09-28 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kristen Schnabel
0.018below expectation — took 45% of games against 55% expected
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W
2025-09-21 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Wendy Clarke
+0.008better than expected — took 68% of games against 61% expected
6-1, 7-5
W
Emily Cockrell / Judy Larson
2025-06-26 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with CHERI TURNER
+0.064better than expected — took 86% of games against 51% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
Gail Sears / Sandy Lepagechamps
2025-06-21 · #3 Doubles · with Wendy Clarke
+0.066better than expected — took 67% of games against 38% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2025-06-20 · #3 Doubles · with Wendy Clarke
0.021below expectation — took 25% of games against 39% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2025-06-13 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Wendy Clarke
+0.006below expectation — took 20% of games against 28% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Emma Hoolihan / Karin Gruver
2025-06-06 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Wendy Clarke
0.021below expectation — took 20% of games against 37% expected
6-0, 6-3
W
Emily Cockrell / Marybeth Matlock
2025-06-05 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Micki Hulscher
+0.037better than expected — took 68% of games against 49% expected
7-5, 6-1
L
2025-05-22 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with CHERI TURNER
0.013below expectation — took 45% of games against 51% expected
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
2025-05-09 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Doreen Gavin
+0.014below expectation — took 20% of games against 25% expected
6-2, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.