← Search

Deborah Greber

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Boise, ID
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
72 matches · 28W–44L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history72 matches
L
2026-06-29 · Still Smashed · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Keller
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-06-22 · Still Smashed · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ladawan Johnson
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-10 · Still Smashed · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shannon Page
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
W
2025-07-07 · Still Smashed · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lori Greer
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-3
L
2025-07-02 · Still Smashed · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sandra Gulley
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-06-30 · Still Smashed · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lori Greer
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
W
2025-06-20 · Still Smashed · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sandra Gulley
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-1
L
2025-06-09 · Still Smashed · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lori Greer
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 2-6
W
2024-07-10 · No Drama Mamas · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sandra Gulley
loading the estimate
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L
2024-07-08 · No Drama Mamas · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Margaret Burke
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-6
W
2024-06-12 · No Drama Mamas · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cindy Walker
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-5
W
2024-06-10 · No Drama Mamas · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cindy Walker
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
33.3%
11W–22L · 45.2% of games
4.0
0%
0W–4L · 33.8% of games
7.0
50%
16W–16L · 51.4% of games
8.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
35%
25 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
17 matches
#1 Singles
3%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova