← Search

Jennifer Gadsky

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Saint Louis, MO
5.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
15 matches · 8W–7L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history15 matches
W
2025-07-26 · STL/Gregory/Hi-Tri · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melissa Hoyos
loading the estimate
7-5, 3-1
L
2025-07-22 · STL/Gregory/Hi-Tri · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Beatriz Juan Miranzo
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2025-07-19 · STL/Gregory/Hi-Tri · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melissa Hoyos
loading the estimate
7-5, 3-1
L
2024-07-30 · Gadsky · #2 Doubles · 10.0 · with Matt Mainer mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 4-6
L
2024-07-23 · Gadsky · #3 Doubles · 10.0 · with Matt Mainer mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 3-6
L
2024-07-04 · Gadsky · #2 Doubles · 10.0 · with Matt Mainer mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 1-6
L
2024-06-25 · Gadsky · #3 Doubles · 10.0 · with Matt Mainer mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 4-6
W
2023-06-25 · MOValley/Gadsky/18&Over5.0W · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Sampada Coster
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
2023-06-18 · MOValley/Gadsky/18&Over5.0W · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Sampada Coster
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
2023-06-04 · MOValley/Gadsky/18&Over5.0W · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Bekah Anderson
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
W
Kim Steinmetz / Shannon Gordon-Carney
2021-07-03 · MOValley/Gadsky/18&Over5.0W · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Jennifer Mckeown
loading the estimate
0-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
Kim Steinmetz / Shannon Gordon-Carney
2021-06-30 · MOValley/Gadsky/18&Over5.0W · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Jennifer Mckeown
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.0
75%
6W–2L · 57.1% of games
10.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 32.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 53% of the time
#1 Doubles
53%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer