← Search

Molly Hanlon

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Zionsville, IN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
59 matches · 29W–30L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history59 matches
L
2026-08-06 · Indy A55 7.0W E PATC Kern · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Debbie Bubenzer
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-06 · Indy A40 3.5W PATC Kern · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Huibregtse
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-18 · Indy A55 7.0W E PATC Kern · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karla Kern
loading the estimate
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-15 · Indy A40 3.5W PATC Kern · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Micheline Davis
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-08 · Indy A40 3.5W PATC Kern · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Elgin
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-07-31 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karla Kern
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 2-6
W
2025-07-10 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathy Blackburn
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-2
W
2025-06-26 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Debbie Bubenzer
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 7-6
L
2025-05-22 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elizabeth Judd-Roseman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 2-6
W
2024-08-19 · CIN Indianapolis, A40&O 3.5 W, Kern (ZWMS) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jill Chlystun
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
L
2024-08-12 · CIN Indianapolis, A40&O 3.5 W, Kern (ZWMS) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathy Blackburn
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
L
2024-08-05 · CIN Indianapolis, A40&O 3.5 W, Kern (ZWMS) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kerstin Regele
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
55.6%
25W–20L · 51.4% of games
7.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 38.8% of games
7.5
25%
2W–6L · 40.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 66% of the time
#1 Doubles
66%
39 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
10 matches
#1 Singles
10%
6 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches
#3 Doubles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova