← Search

Wendy McNamar

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Carmel, IN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
78 matches · 41W–37L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history78 matches
W
2026-03-07 · Indy A18 3.5W SAT IRCD Warr · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Teresa Warr
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-02-07 · Indy A18 3.5W SAT IRCD Warr · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Donel Hakes
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-01-24 · Indy A18 3.5W SAT IRCD Warr · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Teresa Berg
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
L
2025-07-31 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Christine Williams
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 4-6
L
2025-07-24 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Christine Williams
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-06-26 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Donel Hakes
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-7
W
2025-06-12 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Donel Hakes
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2025-06-05 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Janis Frazier
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 1-6
L
2024-10-26 · CIN A40 3.5W SA IRCD Melcher · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathy Null
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
W
2024-10-12 · CIN A40 3.5W SA IRCD Melcher · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Teresa Warr
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-5
L
2024-10-05 · CIN A40 3.5W SA IRCD Melcher · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sally Murphy
loading the estimate
5-7, 3-5
W
2024-08-05 · CIN Indianapolis, A40&O 3.5 W, Clark (PATC) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lindsay Rooks
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
67.3%
33W–16L · 56.2% of games
7.0
23.1%
3W–10L · 38% of games
6.5mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 46% of games
7.0mixed
40%
4W–6L · 38.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
35 matches
#2 Doubles
39%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
13 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King