← Search

Christine Williams

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Indianapolis, IN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
49 matches · 15W–34L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history49 matches
L
2026-06-25 · Indy A55 7.0W E BRE McNamar · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sally Murphy
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-01-10 · Indy A18 3.5W SAT IRCD Warr · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Donel Hakes
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-07-31 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Wendy McNamar
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 4-6
L
2025-07-26 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Beth Scott
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 2-6
L
2025-07-24 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Wendy McNamar
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
W
2025-06-05 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathy Null
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2024-08-05 · CIN Indianapolis, A40&O 3.5 W, Hill (IHP) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Margaret Kutin
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
L
2024-07-29 · CIN Indianapolis, A40&O 3.5 W, Hill (IHP) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jordyn McAfee
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-3
L
2024-07-25 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Donel Hakes
loading the estimate
6-7, 3-6
L
2024-07-22 · CIN Indianapolis, A40&O 3.5 W, Hill (IHP) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Spolyar
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
W
2024-07-08 · CIN Indianapolis, A40&O 3.5 W, Hill (IHP) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stacey Boggs
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-0
L
2024-06-27 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Teresa Warr
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
26.5%
9W–25L · 41% of games
7.0
40%
6W–9L · 44.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 49% of the time
#2 Doubles
49%
24 matches
#1 Doubles
37%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams