← Search

Mike Aagesen

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Dalton Gardens, ID
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
23 matches · 14W–9L · seasons 2019–2024
Match history23 matches
L
2024-03-22 · PEAK-Past our Peak · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Williams
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-5
W
2024-02-16 · PEAK-Past our Peak · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Doug Conboy
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
L
2024-01-26 · PEAK-Past our Peak · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeff Woodie
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2023-02-05 · WCCP-Fountain · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Danko Martincic
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
W
2022-04-10 · SC-Fountain · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kevin Tweed
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
L
2022-03-27 · SC-Fountain · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Ryan
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2022-03-12 · SC-Fountain · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kevin Tweed
loading the estimate
0-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2022-02-26 · SC-Fountain · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Craig Hart
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
W
2022-01-22 · SC-Fountain · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kevin Tweed
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2021-10-23 · PEAK-Qualls · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Williams
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-2
W
2021-06-06 · PEAK-Qualls · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Williams
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-0
W
2021-06-05 · PEAK-Qualls · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Williams
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2019–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
52.9%
9W–8L · 50.3% of games
8.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 62.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 44% of the time
#2 Doubles
44%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe