← Search

Julie Walker

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Park City, UT
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
24 matches · 10W–14L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history24 matches
L
2026-11-03 · PC MARC-Alexander/Levin · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Byington
loading the estimate
6-7, 1-4
L
2026-08-01 · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Catherine Clark
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-02 · PC MARC-Alexander/Weise · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Catherine Clark
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-05-26 · PC MARC-Alexander/Weise · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bonnie Davis
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-21 · PC MARC-Alexander/Weise · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Catherine Clark
loading the estimate
6-3, 5-7, 0-1
W
2025-05-09 · Park City MARC-Byrne/Alexander · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebecca Rush
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2025-05-02 · Park City MARC-Byrne/Alexander · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebecca Rush
loading the estimate
5-7, 0-6
L
2025-04-15 · Park City MARC-Byrne/Alexander · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bonnie Davis
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-7
L
2025-04-08 · Park City MARC-Byrne/Alexander · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cathy Siegal
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-3, 0-1
W
2023-06-12 · Park City MARC-Tomczyk/Leigh · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Yocum
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-1
W
2023-06-05 · Park City MARC-Tomczyk/Leigh · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michelle Couderc
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
38.9%
7W–11L · 49.5% of games
7.0
50%
3W–3L · 50.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 29% of the time
#3 Doubles
29%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
6 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
5 matches
#1 Singles
13%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
13%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert