Search

Lindsay Lafeen

Murray, UT
3.5C year-end 2025
72 matches · 29W–43L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh
Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely.
i
The dashed lines are the edges of your band. The three shaded areas are exactly the three percentages below — area here is the chance of one outcome for you, not a count of players.
3.10
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 14 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
11%
down to 3.0
89%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 7% down · 93% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.12. Higher than today’s 3.10 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure.
i
scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model. USTA publishes year-end ratings in December, which is when this gets graded against what actually happened.
Where you rank
UT · 3.5
168 of 176
By our estimated rating, not the published level.
i
Lindsay is ranked against players at the same level in the same place. The published level is identical for everyone in a band, so it cannot separate them — our estimate can. Groups smaller than five are not ranked at all, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Lindsay has played at 4.0, 3.5 across 5 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

3.03.54.020192021202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2024, 2025 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level10 levels played
0.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 56.9% of games
3.5
30%
6W–14L · 42.9% of games
4.0
33.3%
3W–6L · 42.9% of games
7.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
25%
1W–3L · 48.5% of games
7.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 52% of games
7.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 40.9% of games
8.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 51.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history72 matches
L
2026-07-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachel Stohlton
0.009below expectation — took 33% of games against 41% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
Kelly Webster / Ann Weaver
2026-07-14 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Staley
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
Catherine Clark / Julie Walker
2026-07-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather George
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-3, 6-4
L
Jennifer Davies / Jessica Studdert
2026-06-30 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Staley
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
Tiffany Riley / Rebecca Suelzle
2026-06-23 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Evans
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-1, 6-3
W
Lauren Annunziata / Jenna Nicholson
2026-06-16 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Staley
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-26 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Evans
+0.034better than expected — took 48% of games against 37% expected
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
Paige Smathers / Candace Haroldsen
2026-05-12 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Catherine van Uitert
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-2, 6-2
W
Stephanie Sobotka / Allyson Smith
2026-05-05 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Evans
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-4, 6-2
L
Katy Patterson / Romina Fabiani
2026-04-28 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Evans
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Carly Johnston / Catherine Dunn
2026-04-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Nelson
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
1-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-03-10 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Nelson
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
7-5, 3-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.