← Search

John Holland

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
NEW PORT RICHEY, FL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
125 matches · 60W–65L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history125 matches
L
2026-02-15 · Davis Island - S. Mullis · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Payne
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-02-08 · Davis Island - S. Mullis · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mark Wolfson
loading the estimate
0-6, 5-7
L
2026-01-30 · Davis Island - S. Mullis · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mark Wolfson
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-03-22 · McMullen King 55 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with David King
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 1-6
L
2025-03-01 · McMullen King 55 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Paul Zack
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 6-4, 0-1
W
2025-02-22 · McMullen King 55 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steven Ehrenpreis
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 7-6
L
2025-02-01 · McMullen King 55 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jim Stefan
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 0-6
L
2024-05-18 · Pinellas/Hollingsworth/40&Over4.0M · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Laccabue
loading the estimate
6-2, 0-6, 0-1
W
2024-05-11 · Pinellas/Hollingsworth/40&Over4.0M · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark Wolfson
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2024-05-04 · Pinellas/Hollingsworth/40&Over4.0M · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kevin Brick
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-5
L
2024-04-28 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mark Wolfson championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2024-04-27 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mark Wolfson championship
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
65%
39W–21L · 56.8% of games
4.5
23.3%
7W–23L · 38.1% of games
8.0
45%
9W–11L · 46.4% of games
8.5
0%
0W–9L · 39.9% of games
8.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 62.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 45% of the time
#2 Doubles
45%
56 matches
#1 Doubles
34%
42 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
27 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams