← Search

Lisa Atwood

Newcastle, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
68 matches · 16W–52L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Lisa Atwood to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history68 matches
L
2025-11-09 · RBW-Love Hurts! Edwards · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karalyn Kedroske
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2025-11-02 · RBW-Love Hurts! Edwards · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karalyn Kedroske
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-10-12 · RBW-Love Hurts! Edwards · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Stella Withey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-4
L
2025-10-03 · RBW-Love Hurts! Edwards · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karalyn Kedroske
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-08-05 · Atworth · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Skipworth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-07-31 · Atworth · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Skipworth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-2
W
2025-07-25 · Atworth · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Skipworth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2025-07-22 · Atworth · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Skipworth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2025-07-12 · Atworth · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Skipworth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2025-07-03 · Atworth · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Skipworth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2025-05-24 · WSC-Kedroske · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Skipworth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-05-16 · WSC-Kedroske · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Skipworth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
21.3%
10W–37L · 38.4% of games
8.0
0%
0W–4L · 39.7% of games
8.0mixed
33.3%
4W–8L · 42.9% of games
9.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 51.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 63% of the time
#1 Doubles
63%
43 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe