Karen Griffiths
Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Indianapolis, IN
70 matches · 14W–56L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history70 matches
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 2-6
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 4-6
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 4-6
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 2-6
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 4-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2019–2025
CIN C 7.5W IRCD Lane
CIN Indianapolis, A40&O 4.0 W, Lane (JCC)
CIN Indianapolis, Combo 7.5 W, Somers (JCC)
CIN Indianapolis, M40&O 8.0, Squires (PATC)
Racquettes
CIN Indianapolis, A18&O 4.0 W, Embry (IRC-D)
CIN Indianapolis, Doubles 4.0, Griffiths (IRC-D)
CIN Indianapolis, M18&O 8.0, Squires (PATC)
CIN Indianapolis, M18&O 8.0, Squires (PATC)
CIN Indianapolis, M40&O 8.0, Squires (PATC)
CIN Indianapolis, M40&O 8.0, Squires (PATC)
Racquettes
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0
18.8%
6W–26L · 38.5% of games
7.5
41.7%
5W–7L · 41.3% of games
8.0
0%
0W–10L · 25.3% of games
8.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
27.3%
3W–8L · 43.1% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #3 Doubles, 47% of the time
#3 Doubles
47%
33 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
20 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
16 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.