← Search

Jared Kaban

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Westfield, NJ
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
41 matches · 28W–13L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history41 matches
L
2026-07-09 · WTC Deuces · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jonathan Earl
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-08 · WTC Deuces · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Justin Goldman
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-26 · WTC Deuces · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jonathan Fayer
loading the estimate
6-7, 2-6
W
2025-09-14 · NJ: Ballboys · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Francis Giglio championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-4
W
2025-08-26 · NJ: Ballboys · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Francis Giglio
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-0
W
2025-08-21 · NJ: Ballboys · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Douglass Coyle
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-2
W
2025-08-14 · NJ: Ballboys · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Vladi Tsipenyuk
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-4
L
2024-04-14 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Danielle Nappi mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2024-03-09 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Pamela Calaquian mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
2024-01-20 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cecilia Orchard mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L
2023-12-16 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Regan Shafer mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 0-6
L
2023-03-25 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sherla Glasgow mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.5
0%
0W–4L · 35.1% of games
9.0
100%
4W–0L · 75% of games
7.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
68%
17W–8L · 59.7% of games
9.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
16 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova