Search

Jonathan Earl

year-end
32 matches · 14W–18L · seasons 20212026

Captains: add Jonathan Earl to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history32 matches
L
2026-07-09 · WTC Deuces · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jared Kaban
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
JACOB PEREZ / Peter Todoric
2026-06-23 · WTC Deuces · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with David Roszak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-16 · NJD/NJ Smash · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Vivek Sahota
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
James Cryan / David Blake
2026-06-02 · NJD/NJ Smash · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Matthew Gitterman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
H William Danser / Brian Peters
2026-05-26 · NJD/NJ Smash · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Matthew Gitterman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-05-12 · NJD/NJ Smash · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Vivek Sahota
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-0
W
2026-04-26 · NJD/NJ Smash · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jason Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2025-08-28 · NJ: Ballboys · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Henry Lanman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2025-08-19 · NJ: Ballboys · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Henry Lanman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2025-06-07 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jason Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
Harrison Abrams / Jason Smith
2024-10-23 · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Todd Sherman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-4, 1-0
L
Harrison Abrams / Jason Smith
2024-10-16 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Todd Sherman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
Teams6 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.5
50%
10W–10L · 50.7% of games
5.0
0%
0W–6L · 41.1% of games
9.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 64.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert