← Search

Kevin Proctor

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Montclair, NJ
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
35 matches · 12W–23L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history35 matches
L
2025-08-28 · Team Song · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Joseph Iwanski
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
2025-08-26 · Team Song · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Frank Dunne
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 0-6
L
2025-08-19 · Team Song · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Frank Dunne
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-08-14 · Team Song · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Andrew Song
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 4-6
L
2024-05-11 · Team Kuszelewicz/Trang · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Carla Gaeta mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2024-05-04 · Team Kuszelewicz/Trang · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jean Zhang mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 5-7
L
2024-04-28 · Team Kuszelewicz/Trang · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sharon Becker mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2024-04-27 · Team Kuszelewicz/Trang · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jean Zhang mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2024-04-20 · Team Kuszelewicz/Trang · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sharon Becker mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 5-2, 0-1
L
2024-03-30 · Team Kuszelewicz/Trang · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Donna Nagel mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
L
2024-03-02 · Team Kuszelewicz/Trang · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Carla Gaeta mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2023-07-12 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Adelo Mascarinas
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
75%
9W–3L · 57.9% of games
9.0
0%
0W–4L · 31.3% of games
8.0mixed
16.7%
3W–15L · 41.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
10 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert