← Search

Jason Krbec

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Chicago, IL
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
18 matches · 8W–10L · seasons 2023–2026
Match history18 matches
W
2026-06-06 · CDTA S 18&OM4.0 8.Tam Bhat Sat 3 $22 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Keith Sgariglia
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-02 · CDTA S 18&OM4.0 8.Tam Bhat Sat 3 $22 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christopher Urso
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-05-09 · CDTA S 18&OM4.0 8.Tam Bhat Sat 3 $22 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Leubner
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-04-25 · CDTA W 18&OM4.0 6.Tam Bhat Sat 3 $22 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Leubner
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
L
2025-05-03 · CDTA W ComboX7.5 5.MT Chi Brown Sat 6 $31.5 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jamie Burns mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 3-6
W
2025-04-12 · CDTA W ComboX7.5 5.MT Chi Brown Sat 6 $31.5 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kajal Sangal mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-4
L
2025-04-06 · CDTA W M18&OX8.0 3.Tam Wu Sun 6 $22 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Gertrudes Pangilinan mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-03-29 · CDTA W ComboX7.5 5.MT Chi Brown Sat 6 $31.5 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rachel Fuller mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 6-5, 0-1
L
2025-03-28 · CDTA W M18&OX9.0 5.Lake Bluff Pacaut Sun 6 $22 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Mary Therese Lee mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
W
2025-03-02 · CDTA W M18&OX9.0 5.Lake Bluff Pacaut Sun 6 $22 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Polina Chala mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-1
L
2025-02-23 · CDTA W M18&OX9.0 5.Lake Bluff Pacaut Sun 6 $22 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kaitlin Ulbert mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 2-6
W
2025-02-02 · CDTA W M18&OX8.0 3.Tam Wu Sun 6 $22 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Angela Tsang mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
100%
4W–0L · 68.7% of games
4.5
25%
1W–3L · 39.4% of games
10.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 41.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 44% of the time
#2 Doubles
44%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
39%
7 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams