Search

Vikas Bhatia

Kirkland, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
61 matches · 20W–41L · seasons 20222026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.83
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 7 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
99%
stay 3.0
1%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Kirkland · 3.0
39 of 62
WA · 3.0
707 of 1107

Vikas is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Vikas has been a steady 3.0 across all 4 seasons on record.

2.53.02023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Vikas has gone from the 58th to the 65th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
0.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0
50%
15W–15L · 48.4% of games
6.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
18.5%
5W–22L · 35.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history61 matches
W
John Hughes / Judith Mamixed
2026-07-11 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Salome Koloffon Tella
+0.000better than expected — took 75% of games against 56% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
Gavin Curtis / MIke Wood
2026-05-31 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Abhishek Singh
0.067below expectation — took 14% of games against 50% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
Teng Gu / Eysen Shi
2026-05-02 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ashwin Jeyakumar
+0.066better than expected — took 92% of games against 55% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
Salim Peshawaria / Armaan Pandey
2026-04-10 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Daniel Do
0.010below expectation — took 50% of games against 55% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
Eddy Ferre / Yogesh Bedwal
2026-02-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Utsav Prabhu
+0.014about as expected — took 50% of games against 45% expected
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
Jerry Osborn / Peyman Oreizy
2026-02-08 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Daniel Do
+0.075better than expected — took 80% of games against 43% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
Tina Mccorkindale / Joshua Leemixed
2025-11-22 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tena Hanson
+0.000about as expected — took 44% of games against 42% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Chrissy O'Rourke / Stephen Damemixed
2025-08-03 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jiandan Zheng
+0.000better than expected — took 38% of games against 33% expected
7-5, 6-3
L
Frank Liu / Zhe Zhang
2025-07-29 · #1 Male Doubles · 0.0 · with Han Zhao
0.081below expectation — took 0% of games against 45% expected
6-0
L
Jianfeng Zeng / Ruochen Wang
2025-07-08 · #1 Male Doubles · 0.0 · with WENSI LI
+0.026better than expected — took 40% of games against 33% expected
6-4
L
Prithu Jain / Susan Lustymixed
2025-07-06 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Rama Karve
+0.000below expectation — took 8% of games against 47% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
Connie Chou / William Miaomixed
2025-06-29 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with MJ Kimm
+0.000below expectation — took 33% of games against 50% expected
6-4, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.