← Search

Jerome Lawson

Rock Hill, SC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
73 matches · 15W–58L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Jerome Lawson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history73 matches
W
2026-07-15 · CChildress/Donoghue (Matthews) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nicole Morris mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-07-14 · SJPragasam/ACheek (Park Road) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Megan Pruski mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-08 · CChildress/Donoghue (Matthews) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nicole Morris mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-07 · SJPragasam/ACheek (Park Road) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Hollifield mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-24 · CChildress/Donoghue (Matthews) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carol Childress mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-23 · SJPragasam/ACheek (Park Road) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amanda Cheek mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-09 · SJPragasam/ACheek (Park Road) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Hollifield mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-03 · CChildress/Donoghue (Matthews) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carol Childress mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-02 · SJPragasam/ACheek (Park Road) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with SJ Pragasam mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-04-11 · MCTA55/Teat/RHTC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tim O'Brien
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-04 · MCTA55/Teat/RHTC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Goetz Hagen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-04-02 · MCTA40/MollT/RHTC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rafael Balderrama
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
0%
0W–4L · 40.3% of games
4.0
12.5%
3W–21L · 30.6% of games
7.5
33.3%
7W–14L · 45% of games
4.0mixed
26.7%
4W–11L · 39.6% of games
7.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 43.5% of games
8.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 40% of the time
#3 Doubles
40%
29 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
27 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
17 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova