← Search

Rusty Shaw

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Lubbock, TX
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
112 matches · 59W–53L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history112 matches
W
2026-05-11 · Aulisa/Shank · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with AJ Funk
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-27 · Aulisa/Shank · #2 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-04-13 · Aulisa/Shank · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gabriel Axelrud
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-04-08 · Aulisa/Shank · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bladen Fuller
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-06 · Aulisa/Shank · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Chad Carter
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-09 · Shank · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Chad Carter
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-03-05 · Shank · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eugenio Aulisa
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-03-02 · Shank · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robert Craig
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-23 · Shank · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robert Craig
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-02-16 · Shank · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Chad Carter
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-02-09 · Shank · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robert Craig
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2025-05-19 · Olivero · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Salomon Oliveros Parra
loading the estimate
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
56.5%
39W–30L · 53.4% of games
6.5
0%
0W–5L · 32.3% of games
7.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5
55.6%
5W–4L · 51.9% of games
6.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 56% of games
7.0mixed
52.4%
11W–10L · 51.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
42 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
26 matches
#1 Singles
8%
9 matches
#2 Singles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova