Linda Smith
Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Naples, FL
124 matches · 73W–51L · seasons 2018–2025
Match history124 matches
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 3-6
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 2-6
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-4
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-3
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-4
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2019–2025
Grey Oaks - Romano
Grey Oaks / Romano
COLLIER/Miller/Combo50&over7.5W
Grey Oaks - Romano
Grey Oaks - Romano
Grey Oaks - Archie
Grey Oaks - L. Smith
Grey Oaks - Romano
Grey Oaks - Streibich
COLLIER - Archie
COLLIER - Grey Oaks - Lavery
Grey Oaks
Grey Oaks - J. Archie
Heritage Bay - Barger
Naples Grande - L. Lavery
Naples Grande - L. Lavery
COLLIER - Grey Oaks - Lavery
Fall Winners - Naples Grande - L. Lavery
Flight Winners - Grey Oaks - J. Archie
Heritage Bay - Barger
Naples Grande - L. Lavery
Naples Grande - L. Lavery
Naples Grande - L. Lavery
Naples Grande - L. Lavery
Collier - Pelican Marsh - Barger
Grey Oaks - J. Archie
Naples Grande - Lavery
Naples Grande - Lavery
Naples Grande - Smith/Lavery
Pelican Marsh - Barger
Flight Winners-Grey Oaks
Grey Oaks - Etten
Grey Oaks - Lavery
Naples Beach Club - Jaksich
Quail Creek - Osborne
Treviso Bay - L. Smith
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
41.7%
5W–7L · 45.2% of games
4.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
80%
8W–2L · 54.9% of games
7.5
83.8%
31W–6L · 60.9% of games
8.0
25%
5W–15L · 40.9% of games
8.0mixed
53.5%
23W–20L · 51.1% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 54% of the time
#1 Doubles
54%
67 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
28 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
Pressure is a privilege.