← Search

Pamela Oleksa

— year-end
51 matches · 22W–29L · seasons 2019–2021

Captains: add Pamela Oleksa to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history51 matches
W
2021-12-11 · #3 Doubles · with Susan Danowski-Miller championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2021-11-14 · Hempfield - Covell · #3 Doubles · with Stephanie Woomer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2021-11-07 · Hempfield - Covell · #3 Doubles · with Susan Danowski-Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2021-10-23 · Hempfield - Covell · #3 Doubles · with JoAnne Hangen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2021-08-04 · Hempfield - Forrey · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carol Dimm
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2021-07-28 · Hempfield - Forrey · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carol Dimm
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
Madonna Hufnagel / Sharon McLaughlin
2021-07-24 · #3 Doubles · with Sandra Callanan championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L
2021-07-21 · Hempfield - Forrey · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marla Triano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2021-07-08 · Hempfield - Triano · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dorota Gasiorowski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2021-06-30 · CPD/Hempfield - Brooks · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sandra Callanan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2021-06-16 · Hempfield - Hangen 55 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jo Ann Moldenhauer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2021-06-14 · Hempfield - Triano · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with JoAnne Hangen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
Teams13 teams · 2020–2021
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
50%
7W–7L · 49.8% of games
4.0
20%
1W–4L · 32.6% of games
7.0
62.5%
5W–3L · 54.3% of games
7.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 33.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 47% of the time
#3 Doubles
47%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
15 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer