← Search

Lorri Mandekic

Henderson, NV
0.0 year-end
65 matches · 27W–38L · seasons 2019–2021
Where Lorri sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Lorri is one of 0 women at 0.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Lorri has been a steady 4.0 across all 3 seasons on record.

3.54.0201920202021

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Lorri has gone from the 53rd to the 43rd percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2021.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
4.0
43.9%
25W–32L · 49.8% of games
8.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history65 matches
L
Sandi Oberling / Tracy Ford
2021-11-08 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sonia Vermeys
−0.013below expectation — took 25% of games against 37% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
Ruth-Ann Edwards / Cynthia Graham
2021-10-25 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Regin
+0.003about as expected — took 35% of games against 37% expected
6-2, 7-5
L
2021-10-23 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sonia Vermeys
−0.038below expectation — took 20% of games against 42% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Kathy Morris / Catherine Rohaly
2021-10-18 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Valerie Murphy
+0.021better than expected — took 43% of games against 37% expected
6-4, 7-6
W
N/A
2021-10-11 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Valerie Murphy
−0.064about as expected — took 100% of games against 96% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Elizabeth McManus / Kimberlie Bayne
2021-09-20 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Regin
+0.011about as expected — took 41% of games against 38% expected
6-3, 7-6
L
2021-09-18 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Monica Frace
−0.001about as expected — took 56% of games against 53% expected
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2021-09-13 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Monica Frace
−0.044below expectation — took 29% of games against 52% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Karen Miller / Samantha Linares
2021-06-05 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sonia Vermeys
+0.002about as expected — took 46% of games against 45% expected
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
W
2021-05-08 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sonia Vermeys
+0.017better than expected — took 71% of games against 59% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
Susan Norris / Stacey Smith
2021-04-26 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sonia Vermeys
−0.012below expectation — took 29% of games against 39% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
2021-04-24 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Valerie Murphy
−0.053below expectation — took 41% of games against 62% expected
7-5, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.