← Search

Paul Honda

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Chino Hills, CA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
49 matches · 16W–33L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history49 matches
L
2026-06-14 · SGV Glendora Rebels-Bituin-Dawson Park/SA3 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Shih-Ching Wang
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-06 · SGV Glendora Rebels-Bituin-Dawson Park/SA3 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Shih-Ching Wang
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-05-09 · SGV Mix and Match-Sugihara-Claremont Club/SA4 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with MAY-MAY SUGIHARA mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-29 · SGV Mix and Match-Sugihara-Claremont Club/SA3 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with MAY-MAY SUGIHARA mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-07 · SGV Mix and Match-Sugihara-Claremont Club/SA3 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Patricia Ash mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-01-24 · SGV Glendora Rebels-Bituin-Dawson Park/SA2 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shih-Ching Wang
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
W
2025-06-28 · SGV Glendora Rebels-Bituin-Dawson Park/SA3 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Shih-Ching Wang
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-06-15 · SGV Glendora Rebels-Bituin-Dawson Park/SA3 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Adam Li Lin
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
2025-03-22 · SGV Glendora Rebels-Bituin-Dawson Park/SA2 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shih-Ching Wang
loading the estimate
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W
2025-03-15 · SGV Glendora Rebels-Bituin-Dawson Park/SA2 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shih-Ching Wang
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
L
2025-03-01 · SGV Glendora Rebels-Bituin-Dawson Park/SA2 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laurent Boilly
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-02-23 · IE-TCC-Cardona · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Eva Revesz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
50%
3W–3L · 44.6% of games
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0
22.2%
2W–7L · 39.6% of games
7.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
0.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 65.7% of games
6.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 36.5% of games
7.0mixed
16.7%
3W–15L · 32.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 45% of the time
#2 Doubles
45%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
37%
18 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal