← Search

Joseph Gann

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Belmont, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
133 matches · 88W–45L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history133 matches
L
2026-09-30 · JFulcomer (Southampton) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Giles Beal
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-18 · JFulcomer (Southampton) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with MARK TERRIO
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-0
W
2026-07-01 · JFulcomer/KFulcomer (Southampton) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Rivera mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-06-24 · JFulcomer/KFulcomer (Southampton) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dorothy Ilse mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-10 · JFulcomer/KFulcomer (Southampton) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nancy Pridnia mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-03 · JFulcomer/KFulcomer (Southampton) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Rivera mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-27 · JFulcomer/KFulcomer (Southampton) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Rivera mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-05-03 · JFulcomer (Southampton) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gary Covitz
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-03-29 · JFulcomer (Southampton) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gary Covitz
loading the estimate
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-20 · JFulcomer (Southampton) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Steffey
loading the estimate
1-6
L
2026-03-04 · JFulcomer (Southampton) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Lucas
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-01 · JFulcomer (Southampton) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Lucas
loading the estimate
4-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
86.3%
44W–7L · 64.7% of games
4.0
33.3%
5W–10L · 43.7% of games
7.5
73.1%
19W–7L · 61.2% of games
8.5
36.4%
4W–7L · 51.2% of games
4.0mixed
50%
6W–6L · 45.2% of games
7.0mixed
66.7%
10W–5L · 56.6% of games
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
54 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
47 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
32 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer