Search

Stephen Mileham

BRADENTON, FL
0.0 year-end
63 matches · 35W–28L · seasons 20192023
Where Stephen sits
65
2.5
683
3.0
1159
3.5
856
4.0
395
4.5
67
5.0

Stephen is one of 0 men at 0.0 in this cohort of 3225. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Teams50 teams · 2009–2023
N OR-MAC-Wright
2023 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Men
2023
MAC-Wright/Eisen
2022 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Men
2022
MAC-Wright/Inkpen
2022 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Men
2022
MAC-Wright
2022 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Men
2022
MAC-Wright
2021 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Men
2021
MAC-Wright/Humpage
2021 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Men
2021
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Stephen has been a steady 3.5 across all 4 seasons on record.

3.03.52019202020212022

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Stephen has gone from the 91st to the 86th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2022.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.5
56.5%
13W–10L · 56.7% of games
4.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 34.9% of games
7.0
66.7%
8W–4L · 59.5% of games
8.0
0%
0W–5L · 34.1% of games
6.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history63 matches
L
2023-06-25 · N OR-MAC-Wright · #2 Doubles · with Jeffrey Bayless
0.006below expectation — took 29% of games against 37% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
2023-06-24 · N OR-MAC-Wright · #2 Doubles · with JOHN KNOX
0.036below expectation — took 50% of games against 64% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2023-06-24 · N OR-MAC-Wright · #1 Doubles · with Jeffrey Bayless
+0.009about as expected — took 47% of games against 45% expected
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Emmitt Jackson / John Hilmeschamps
2023-06-23 · N OR-MAC-Wright · #1 Doubles · with Jeffrey Bayless
+0.001about as expected — took 61% of games against 59% expected
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
Min Lee / Dave Kuhnschamps
2022-12-04 · N OR-MAC-Wright · #3 Doubles · with Jeffrey Bayless
+0.021better than expected — took 57% of games against 47% expected
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W
Chinwoo Kim / JIN PARKchamps
2022-12-03 · N OR-MAC-Wright · #3 Doubles · with Jeffrey Bayless
+0.008about as expected — took 59% of games against 55% expected
7-6, 6-3
L
2022-10-01 · N OR-MAC-Wright · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Fred Winter
0.003about as expected — took 41% of games against 43% expected
7-6, 6-3
L
2022-09-24 · N OR-MAC-Wright · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Fred Winter
0.028below expectation — took 45% of games against 57% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2022-09-11 · N OR-MAC-Wright · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Fred Winter
+0.027better than expected — took 60% of games against 47% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
Ray Willman / John Omlinchamps
2022-06-25 · MAC-Wright/Inkpen · #1 Doubles · with Glenn Eisen
+0.042better than expected — took 71% of games against 49% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Steven Morta / Douglas Keckchamps
2022-06-25 · MAC-Wright/Inkpen · #3 Doubles · with Glenn Eisen
+0.019better than expected — took 71% of games against 58% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
2022-06-24 · MAC-Wright/Inkpen · #3 Doubles · with Tony Humpage
0.040below expectation — took 38% of games against 56% expected
6-3, 7-5
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.