Search

Pamela Keller

Bellevue, WA
2.5C year-end 2025
126 matches · 41W–85L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.02.53.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.42
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 8 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.0
84%
stay 2.5
16%
up to 3.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 96% stay · 4% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.36. Lower than today’s 2.42 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 2.5 runs from 2.01 to 2.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
WA · 2.5
25 of 35

Pamela is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Pamela has played at 3.0, 2.5 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

2.02.53.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Pamela has gone from the 14th to the 3rd percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.0
29.2%
19W–46L · 42.1% of games
6.0
38.2%
13W–21L · 43.4% of games
6.0mixed
22.7%
5W–17L · 37.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history126 matches
L
Julie Love / Andrea Watson
2026-04-22 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Adkins
0.013below expectation — took 28% of games against 38% expected
7-5, 6-0
L
Kate Goodman / Carrie Priebe
2026-04-07 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Yoko Nishino
0.012below expectation — took 29% of games against 39% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Amy Olason / Tara Stopforth
2026-03-31 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brenda Schlemlein
+0.019better than expected — took 52% of games against 45% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Meg Viera / Rebecca Zimmer
2026-02-20 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Grace Drone
0.024below expectation — took 14% of games against 34% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
Motomi Kudo-King / Hannah Smolinski
2026-01-18 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Grace Drone
0.024below expectation — took 25% of games against 41% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2025-10-25 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Karen Morikubo
0.019below expectation — took 25% of games against 39% expected
6-0, 6-4
W
Adawna Windom / Louise Radtke
2025-10-18 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Karen Morikubo
+0.063better than expected — took 75% of games against 44% expected
6-0, 6-4
L
Indu Basavaiah / Roo Mulligan
2025-09-20 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Barbara Smith
0.043below expectation — took 41% of games against 59% expected
7-5, 6-4
L
Wai Man Cheng / Rhonda Sinwell
2025-05-27 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Seungwon Lee
+0.004about as expected — took 46% of games against 44% expected
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
Cristi Rivas / Ruth Chan
2025-05-06 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Seungwon Lee
+0.014better than expected — took 50% of games against 43% expected
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Tracy Brodahl / Cynthia Axtman
2025-04-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dayna Wurster
+0.012about as expected — took 25% of games against 29% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Melissa Jamison / Sarah Bierlink
2025-04-15 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Wendy Redding
0.008below expectation — took 28% of games against 37% expected
7-5, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.