← Search

Tracy Marks

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Moseley, VA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
245 matches · 102W–143L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history245 matches
W
2026-05-19 · MTC Miracles - Marks · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Caleb Geoghegan
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-05-13 · MTC Wise Honey Badgers - Cutlip · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kenneth Adams
loading the estimate
3-5
W
2026-05-12 · MTC Miracles - Marks · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Caleb Geoghegan
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-05-06 · MTC Wise Honey Badgers - Cutlip · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bhaskar Sosale
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-05 · MTC Miracles - Marks · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Caleb Geoghegan
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-04-29 · MTC Wise Honey Badgers - Cutlip · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ed Plamp
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-7
W
2026-04-28 · MTC Miracles - Marks · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Caleb Geoghegan
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-04-22 · MTC Wise Honey Badgers - Cutlip · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lewis Farinholt
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-21 · MTC Miracles - Marks · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Caleb Geoghegan
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-04-08 · MTC Wise Honey Badgers - Cutlip · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bryan Jones
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-15 · 1 MTC Mixed Miracles - Crews · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Noelle Crews mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-14 · 1 MTC Mixed Miracles - Crews · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jennifer Shaffer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams62 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
3.5
54%
47W–40L · 52.1% of games
4.0
15.4%
2W–11L · 30.9% of games
7.0
48%
12W–13L · 51.2% of games
7.5
40%
2W–3L · 40.2% of games
8.0
28.6%
2W–5L · 43% of games
3.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 54.8% of games
6.5mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 43.4% of games
7.0mixed
44.1%
26W–33L · 48.7% of games
7.5mixed
36.4%
4W–7L · 44.3% of games
8.0mixed
11.5%
3W–23L · 36.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
90 matches
#3 Doubles
36%
89 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
65 matches
#4 Doubles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams