← Search

Frank Flaherty

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Greensboro, NC
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
11 matches · 2W–9L · seasons 2019–2024
Match history11 matches
L
2024-05-15 · Finnegan 3.0M 40s Wed · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michael Kiernan
loading the estimate
1-6, 5-7
L
2024-05-01 · Finnegan 3.0M 40s Wed · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with John Shackelford
loading the estimate
4-6, 0-6
L
2024-04-15 · Finnegan 3.0M 40s Wed · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Pat Hogan
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
W
2024-04-03 · Finnegan 3.0M 40s Wed · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Richard Vest
loading the estimate
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
2024-03-13 · Finnegan 3.0M 40s Wed · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Pat Hogan
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2021-07-20 · SMITH · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Flaherty mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 1-6
L
2021-07-13 · SMITH · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Flaherty mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 3-6
L
2021-06-22 · SMITH · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Flaherty mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 0-6
L
2019-07-16 · SMITH · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ginger Hayworth mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 3-6
L
2019-07-02 · SMITH · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ginger Hayworth mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
W
2019-06-25 · SMITH · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ginger Hayworth mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams3 teams · 2019–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
20%
1W–4L · 37.2% of games
7.0mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 33.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
36%
4 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams