← Search

Kimberly Mrozek

BOISE, ID
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
42 matches · 32W–10L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Kimberly Mrozek to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history42 matches
W
2026-08-27 · Honey Badgers · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Mark Phillips mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-08-20 · Honey Badgers · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Mark Phillips mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
Bianca Mok / Chris Birschbach
2026-07-11 · #2 Doubles · with Jack Yount championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
Yana Ruegsegger / Chris Birschbach
2026-07-10 · #1 Doubles · with Jack Yount championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
Debbie Merritt / Ui Afualo
2026-06-16 · Terminetters · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Rilee Moorhead
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-11 · #1 Doubles · 10.0 · with Alec Tzeng mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-06-08 · #2 Doubles · 10.0 · with Alec Tzeng mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 7-6
W
2026-06-02 · Terminetters · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Rachel Kincheloe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-05-30 · #2 Doubles · 10.0 · with Jack Yount mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-05-30 · #3 Doubles · 10.0 · with Jack Yount mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-29 · #1 Doubles · 10.0 · with Jack Yount mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-19 · Terminetters · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.5
75%
9W–3L · 68% of games
5.0
72.7%
8W–3L · 59.5% of games
10.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 49.6% of games
4.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 56.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
7 matches
#1 Singles
12%
5 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams