← Search

Cheryl Weigel

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Fayetteville, AR
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
34 matches · 17W–17L · seasons 2021–2025
Match history34 matches
L
2025-07-25 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chad Paschall mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 4-6
L
2025-06-26 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mitch Weigel mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-06-09 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joseph Nelson mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-7
W
2024-07-21 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with David Fisher mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 7-6
L
2024-06-23 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mitch Weigel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2024-06-09 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mitch Weigel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2024-05-21 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kelsey Fenton
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
W
2024-04-27 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Nelson
loading the estimate
6-3, 0-6, 1-0
W
2024-04-24 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kelsey Fenton
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2024-04-22 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Natalie Mayer
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
W
2024-03-28 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Morgan Doughty
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2024-03-10 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Nelson
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams4 teams · 2021–2022
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
66.7%
8W–4L · 53.3% of games
3.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
54.5%
6W–5L · 51.8% of games
3.0mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 38% of games
6.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
10 matches
#3 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer