Linda Hennessey
Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Rapid City, SD
55 matches · 9W–46L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history55 matches
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-4
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 3-6
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 4-6
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-4
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 4-6
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 2-6
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 5-7
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2019–2025
6.0 MTC Golden Oldies W65S
6.0 TPR VolleyQueens W65F
6.0 MTC Racquettes W55F
6.0 MTC VolleyQueens W65F
6.0 MTC VolleyQueens W65S
Holding
6.0 MTC VolleyQueens W65F
6.0 MTC VolleyQueens W65S
6.0 ISP Howell W65F
6.0 MTC Stryker W65S
6.0 ISP Howell W65S
6.0 SRP Howell W65F
6.0 Tho Pho Pilar TWO
6.0 ISP Peebles W65F
6.0 ISP Peebles W65S
6.0 Pho Peebles W55F
6.0 ISP Peebles/Pilar W65S
6.0 Pho Peebles/Green W55S
7.0 ISP Peebles 65S
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
6.0
17.6%
9W–42L · 35.5% of games
7.0
0%
0W–4L · 26.2% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #3 Doubles, 67% of the time
#3 Doubles
67%
37 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
8 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.