← Search

Stephanie Radebaugh

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Cockeysville, MD
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
21 matches · 14W–7L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history21 matches
W
2026-03-15 · Baker 3.5-4.5 Tri · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Carol Besse
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
W
Default
2026-03-06 · Baker 3.5-4.5 Tri · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Wendy Heger
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-02-15 · Baker 3.5-4.5 Tri · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Carol Besse
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
W
2025-06-29 · Sandy Skirts · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Yulia Taylor
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
L
2025-06-29 · Sandy Skirts · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Amy Bundy
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-7, 0-1
W
2025-06-28 · Sandy Skirts · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Amy Bundy
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
W
2025-06-27 · Sandy Skirts · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Connie McGowan
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-1
W
2020-02-29 · Murph and the MagicTones · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Derek Radebaugh mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-4
L
2020-02-02 · Murph and the MagicTones · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Derek Radebaugh mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2020-01-31 · Murph and the MagicTones · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Derek Radebaugh mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-2
W
2020-01-24 · Murph and the MagicTones · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Derek Radebaugh mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-4
L
Stephen Woody / Hillary Kuker
2019-06-07 · Smoot · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Joseph D'Agrosa mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.5
66.7%
6W–3L · 63.3% of games
9.0mixed
66.7%
8W–4L · 56.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 71% of the time
#1 Doubles
71%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe