← Search

Hillary Kuker

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Edgewater, MD
4.5A year-end 2024
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
218 matches · 139W–79L · seasons 2017–2026
Match history218 matches
L
2026-06-20 · Vissering · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jonathan Vissering mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 5-7
W
2026-06-20 · Vissering · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Luis Lozano mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-19 · Vissering · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jonathan Vissering mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-05-09 · Vissering - Mixed Groundies & Lobs · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jonathan Vissering mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-04-12 · Vissering - Mixed Groundies & Lobs · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with James Daniel Kohr II mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-04-11 · Vissering - Mixed Groundies & Lobs · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jonathan Vissering mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 7-6
L
2026-03-20 · Vissering · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Leonard Tetteh mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-03-14 · Vissering · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Leonard Tetteh mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-03-06 · Vissering · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Matthew Geppi mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-02-15 · Vissering · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Leonard Tetteh mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-01-31 · Vissering · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jonathan Vissering mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-01-10 · Vissering · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Nathan Leslie mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams63 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level13 levels played
3.5
80%
8W–2L · 63.2% of games
4.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.5
79.2%
42W–11L · 65% of games
5.0
61.5%
8W–5L · 51.3% of games
8.5
64.3%
9W–5L · 56.6% of games
9.5
63.6%
14W–8L · 55% of games
10.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 59.1% of games
4.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 30.9% of games
8.5mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 61.9% of games
9.0mixed
55%
44W–36L · 51.2% of games
9.5mixed
80%
4W–1L · 52.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 54% of the time
#1 Doubles
54%
118 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
66 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
32 matches
Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams