← Search

James Thompson

Seattle, WA
2.5C year-end 2025
91 matches · 31W–60L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
2.02.53.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.65
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 10 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.0
3%
stay 2.5
97%
up to 3.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 37% stay · 63% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.53. Lower than today’s 2.65 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 2.5 runs from 2.01 to 2.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 2.5
3 of 17
WA · 2.5
17 of 81

James is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

James has played at 3.0, 2.5 across 8 seasons — 2 moves up and 2 down.

2.02.53.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, James has gone from the 49th to the 18th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
2.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
35%
28W–52L · 46.4% of games
6.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
0.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history91 matches
L
Anirban Sengupta / Ravendar Lal
2026-06-06 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Terrance Creighton
−0.030below expectation — took 28% of games against 45% expected
7-5, 6-0
L
Mohinder Singh Atwal / Wei Zhao
2026-05-31 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Terrance Creighton
−0.016below expectation — took 8% of games against 28% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
Yingxin Cao / Chenwei Xie
2026-05-30 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alexander North
−0.011about as expected — took 50% of games against 54% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
Max Farrow / Yeong-Ung Yang
2026-05-16 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dustin Ong
−0.027below expectation — took 25% of games against 41% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
N/A
2026-05-15 · #2 Singles · 3.0
+0.110better than expected — took 100% of games against 43% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Nikhil Thaker / Swaroop Krishnamurthy
2026-03-08 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Terrance Creighton
−0.017below expectation — took 35% of games against 45% expected
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
Zekarias Araya / Peter Robison
2026-02-28 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with John Wilmot
−0.017below expectation — took 38% of games against 47% expected
7-5, 6-3
W
Hyung Jin Lee / Haakon Sorensen
2026-02-21 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Terrance Creighton
+0.024better than expected — took 60% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
Matthew Klutznick / Joseph Holmes
2026-01-11 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Terrance Creighton
+0.024better than expected — took 50% of games against 42% expected
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Vijay Dasari / Dave Nguyen
2026-01-02 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Terrance Creighton
+0.002about as expected — took 38% of games against 40% expected
7-6, 6-2
L
Jikun Wang / Haowen Chen
2025-05-11 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Diego Mendivil Pindter
−0.017below expectation — took 32% of games against 42% expected
6-1, 7-5
W
Anton Rivera / Michael Gonzalez
2025-04-27 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Andrew Zarate
−0.004about as expected — took 55% of games against 57% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.