← Search

Cynthia Seagraves-Reed

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Springdale, AR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
125 matches · 46W–79L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history125 matches
W
2026-04-18 · Garlinghouse-Adair/Fayetteville/FAC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brittany Adair
loading the estimate
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-04-11 · Garlinghouse-Adair/Fayetteville/FAC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brittany Adair
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-07 · Garlinghouse-Adair/Fayetteville/FAC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christy Haggard
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-06 · Garlinghouse-Adair/Fayetteville/FAC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Leah Evans
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-02-28 · Garlinghouse-Adair/Fayetteville/FAC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christy Haggard
loading the estimate
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
2025-10-10 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Melanie Bramlett
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2025-09-07 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Cheryl Williams
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
L
2025-08-05 · Adair-Garlinghouse/Fayetteville/FAC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Pat Harris mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-07-13 · Adair-Garlinghouse/Fayetteville/FAC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marty Reed mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
W
2025-06-25 · Adair-Garlinghouse/Fayetteville/FAC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marty Reed mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L
2025-05-20 · Adair-Rucker/Fayetteville/FAC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with April Rucker
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-05-04 · Adair-Garlinghouse/Fayetteville/FAC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Candace Siebenmorgen
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
47.1%
16W–18L · 46.7% of games
3.25
57.1%
8W–6L · 53.8% of games
3.5
36%
9W–16L · 44.6% of games
3.75
23.1%
3W–10L · 41.1% of games
4.0
0%
0W–5L · 16.7% of games
6.5
40%
6W–9L · 43.3% of games
7.5
18.8%
3W–13L · 33.6% of games
3.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 38% of the time
#3 Doubles
38%
47 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
37 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
26 matches
#2 Singles
6%
8 matches
#1 Singles
4%
5 matches
#3 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal