← Search

John Eichenlaub

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Lancaster, PA
4.0S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
25 matches · 9W–16L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history25 matches
L
2026-07-12 · Hempfield - Simmons/Pipkin · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jonathan DeYoung
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-28 · Hempfield - Simmons/Pipkin · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mark Schenk
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-22 · Hempfield - Simmons/Pipkin · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Wilson Pipkin
loading the estimate
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-04 · Hempfield - Simmons/Pipkin · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sean Rowe
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2022-07-11 · Hempfield - Pipkin · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Steve Campbell
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2022-07-10 · Hempfield - Hanna · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Burd
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
2022-07-09 · Hempfield - Hanna · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Burd
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
L
2022-05-05 · Hempfield - Hanna · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matthew Hanna
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
W
2021-08-15 · LTYC - Irwin · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tom Floyd
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2021-07-31 · LTYC - Irwin · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Thomas Rowland
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
L
2019-11-17 · Hempfield - Sumar · #3 Doubles · with Steve Campbell
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-3, 0-1
W
2019-11-03 · Hempfield - Sumar · #3 Doubles · with Steve Campbell
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 46.9% of games
7.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 38.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 40% of the time
#3 Doubles
40%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova