← Search

Renee Brockman

Kennewick, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
96 matches · 42W–54L · seasons 2019–2025

Captains: add Renee Brockman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history96 matches
L
2025-05-17 · PC - Otto · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sondra Edwards
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2025-05-16 · PC - Otto · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sondra Edwards
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2025-05-16 · PC - Otto · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jolene Boughton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2023-10-15 · EW-PC-Kirkham · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Trent Prussing mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
L
2023-10-15 · EW-PC-Kirkham · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Trent Prussing mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
Anthony Smith / Lisa Smith
2023-10-15 · #3 Doubles · with Bryce Richardson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2023-10-14 · EW-PC-Kirkham · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Trent Prussing mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 1-6
L
2023-10-13 · PC-Holle · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bryce Richardson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
2023-07-29 · CBRC-Apex · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Matthew Crusselle mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 7-6
L
2023-07-29 · CBRC-Apex · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Emerson Clark mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-6
L
2023-05-20 · CBRC-McAteer · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jody Davey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
2023-05-19 · CBRC-McAteer · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Chapman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2021–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
73.3%
11W–4L · 58.5% of games
4.0
23.1%
6W–20L · 42% of games
7.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 52.1% of games
8.0mixed
52%
13W–12L · 53.7% of games
9.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 42% of the time
#3 Doubles
42%
40 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
24 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
23 matches
#1 Singles
6%
6 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer