← Search

Mel Terechenok

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Chandler, AZ
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
17 matches · 8W–9L · seasons 2022–2024
Match history17 matches
L
2024-04-17 · 7.0 TPR HuberPochardt M65S · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Charles Meyer
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 5-7
W
2024-04-03 · 7.0 TPR HuberPochardt M65S · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Charles Meyer
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-3
W
2024-03-13 · 7.0 TPR HuberPochardt M65S · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dave Kinghorn
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2024-03-06 · 7.0 TPR HuberPochardt M65S · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dave Kinghorn
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2024-02-14 · 7.0 TPR HuberPochardt M65S · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Don Wester
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 4-3
L
2023-03-20 · 7.0 TPR MeyerHuber M65S · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gary Huber
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 4-6
W
2023-03-08 · 7.0 TPR MeyerHuber M65S · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gary Huber
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2023-02-27 · 7.0 TPR MeyerHuber M65S · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Don Wester
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 2-6
L
2023-02-15 · 7.0 TPR MeyerHuber M65S · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gary Huber
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 4-6
W
2023-02-01 · 7.0 TPR MeyerHuber M65S · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gary Huber
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 7-6
W
2022-04-13 · 7.0 CTC Meyer M65S · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gary Huber
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 7-6
L
2022-04-06 · 7.0 CTC Meyer M65S · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gary Huber
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams3 teams · 2022–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 level played
7.0
47.1%
8W–9L · 46.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 53% of the time
#1 Doubles
53%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova