← Search

Wayne Hall

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Mesa, AZ
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
23 matches · 21W–2L · seasons 2021–2024
Match history23 matches
W
2024-04-27 · AZ/Bryan · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joseph Hook championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-4
W
2024-04-26 · AZ/Bryan · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Walls championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2024-04-25 · AZ/Bryan · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Glenn Holden championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2024-04-17 · PHX/Stevens/65&O/7.0M · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joseph Hook
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-5
W
2024-04-10 · PHX/Stevens/65&O/7.0M · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Glenn Holden
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
W
2024-03-20 · PHX/Stevens/65&O/7.0M · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steve Montoya
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
L
2024-02-14 · PHX/Stevens/65&O/7.0M · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steve Montoya
loading the estimate
6-0, 3-4
W
2023-02-27 · PHX/Stevens/65Over/7.0M · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joseph Hook
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-3
W
2023-02-15 · PHX/Stevens/65Over/7.0M · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Merle Bryan
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 7-5
W
2023-02-01 · PHX/Stevens/65Over/7.0M · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Berger
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2022-04-13 · PHX/StevensRicci/65Over/7.0M · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Earl Backman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2022-03-30 · PHX/StevensRicci/65Over/7.0M · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mike Heusinkveld
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2021–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0
90%
18W–2L · 66% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 48% of the time
#3 Doubles
48%
11 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert