← Search

Michael Walls

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Mesa, AZ
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
52 matches · 41W–11L · seasons 2021–2024
Match history52 matches
W
2024-04-27 · AZ/Bryan · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joe Ricci championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
W
2024-04-26 · AZ/Bryan · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wayne Hall championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2024-04-25 · AZ/Bryan · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joseph Hook championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
W
2024-04-25 · AZ/Bryan · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joe Ricci championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2024-04-10 · PHX/Stevens/65&O/7.0M · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Vince Hughes
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
W
2024-03-06 · PHX/Stevens/65&O/7.0M · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marv Jensen
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
W
2024-02-26 · PHX/Stevens/65&O/7.0M · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Roger Stevens
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
W
2023-03-24 · PHX/Stevens/65Over/7.0M · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Roger Stevens
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-1
W
2023-03-01 · PHX/Stevens/65Over/7.0M · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marv Jensen
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 6-1
W
2023-02-27 · PHX/Stevens/65Over/7.0M · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joe Ricci
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-3
W
2023-02-08 · PHX/Stevens/65Over/7.0M · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Roger Stevens
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-4
L
2023-02-01 · PHX/Stevens/65Over/7.0M · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joseph Hook
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2020–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
75%
6W–2L · 56.3% of games
7.0
79.5%
35W–9L · 61.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
16 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams