← Search

Rudy Tatang

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Chino, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
104 matches · 61W–43L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history104 matches
L
2026-08-30 · SGV Underdogs-Chang-Diamond Bar HS/SU8 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lam Bui
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-26 · SGV Underdogs 55-Nuguid-Diamond Bar HS/SU10 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Hans Stoehr
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-27 · SGV Underdogs 55-Nuguid-Diamond Bar HS/SU10 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Victor Nuguid
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-07 · SGV Underdogs Titans-Le-Diamond Bar HS/SU8 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matthew Huang
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-03 · SGV Underdogs 55-Nuguid-Diamond Bar HS/SU10 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lam Bui
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-26 · SGV Underdogs Titans-Le-Diamond Bar HS/SU8 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ronald Legaspi
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-03-14 · SGV Underdogs Titans-Le-Diamond Bar HS/SU8 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Quang Tran
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-03-08 · SGV Underdogs Titans-Le-Diamond Bar HS/SU8 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tim Nasseir
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-03-01 · SGV Underdogs Titans-Le-Diamond Bar HS/SU8 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gerald Alphonse
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-02-22 · SGV Underdogs Titans-Le-Diamond Bar HS/SU8 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Quang Tran
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-02-08 · SGV Underdogs Titans-Le-Diamond Bar HS/SU8 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark Stone
loading the estimate
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-01-24 · SGV Underdogs Titans-Le-Diamond Bar HS/SU8 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark Stone
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
75%
6W–2L · 59.2% of games
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
76.7%
23W–7L · 59.7% of games
4.0
46.9%
15W–17L · 50.6% of games
7.0
50%
3W–3L · 58.5% of games
8.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 40.2% of games
3.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
60%
9W–6L · 56.2% of games
8.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
49 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
23 matches
#1 Singles
6%
6 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams