Tim Puckett
Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
GREENVILLE, SC
71 matches · 42W–29L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history71 matches
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 0-6, 0-1
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-3
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 2-6
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 4-6
L
Pete Zink / Andy Mintz
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
100%
5W–0L · 57.1% of games
6.5
50%
2W–2L · 53% of games
7.0
76.9%
30W–9L · 58.4% of games
7.5
18.2%
2W–9L · 39.5% of games
8.0
25%
1W–3L · 48.8% of games
8.0mixed
25%
2W–6L · 38.8% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #3 Doubles, 44% of the time
#3 Doubles
44%
31 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
20 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
20 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.