Search

Chizu Hieida

Bremerton, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
64 matches · 29W–35L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.72
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 8 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
100%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Bremerton · 4.0
2 of 9
WA · 4.0
296 of 782

Chizu is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Chizu has been 4.0 for all 6 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

3.54.0201920212022202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2021, 2024 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Chizu has gone from the 94th to the 56th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
4.0
58.6%
17W–12L · 54% of games
4.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 42.3% of games
8.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 54.8% of games
9.0mixed
20%
4W–16L · 41.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history64 matches
W
2026-03-14 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Theresa Smith
0.018below expectation — took 44% of games against 54% expected
6-3, 0-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-07 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Sevey
+0.043better than expected — took 38% of games against 27% expected
6-3, 7-5
L
2025-12-06 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Douglas Doenges
+0.000below expectation — took 38% of games against 48% expected
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
Kim Hood / Brian Johnsonmixed
2025-11-30 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Alisdair Horn
+0.000below expectation — took 28% of games against 60% expected
7-5, 6-0
L
Richard Deitz / Sheryl Brownmixed
2025-11-09 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Alisdair Horn
+0.000better than expected — took 45% of games against 25% expected
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
Branden Muraki / Esther Kimmixed
2025-11-01 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Alisdair Horn
+0.000about as expected — took 33% of games against 37% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
Sirawit Daosaengsawang / Esther Kimmixed
2025-10-26 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Alisdair Horn
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 46% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
2025-10-12 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Alisdair Horn
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 32% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
2025-07-31 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Halie Geier
0.003better than expected — took 75% of games against 68% expected
6-4, 6-0
L
Megan Miller / Kristin Gallagher
2025-07-11 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Halie Geier
0.007below expectation — took 25% of games against 35% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2025-07-10 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lindsey Anderson
0.048below expectation — took 25% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2025-07-06 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Alisdair Horn
+0.000about as expected — took 35% of games against 35% expected
6-1, 7-6
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.