Search

Matt Licholai

Sammamish, WA
0.0 year-end
60 matches · 23W–37L · seasons 20192021
Where Matt sits
73
2.5
775
3.0
1278
3.5
930
4.0
419
4.5
77
5.0

Matt is one of 0 men at 0.0 in this cohort of 3552. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Matt has been 3.5 for all 3 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

3.03.5201920202021

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Matt has gone from the 14th to the 5th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2021.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.5
9.5%
2W–19L · 38.6% of games
6.0
81.8%
9W–2L · 55.1% of games
7.0
41.7%
5W–7L · 50.7% of games
6.0mixed
60%
6W–4L · 49.7% of games
7.0mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 43.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history60 matches
W
N/A
2021-06-26 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steve Rudolf
+0.013better than expected — took 100% of games against 78% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Alan Pugh / Davor Bonaci
2021-06-19 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barrett Park
0.002below expectation — took 25% of games against 33% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2021-05-22 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steve Rudolf
0.010below expectation — took 32% of games against 40% expected
6-1, 7-5
L
Sundar Raghavan / Dhanakodi Karur
2021-05-15 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robert Blasko
0.044below expectation — took 14% of games against 41% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
2021-04-24 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Fletcher
+0.006about as expected — took 38% of games against 38% expected
6-2, 7-6
L
2021-03-19 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Zhang
0.010below expectation — took 20% of games against 33% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2021-03-06 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Fletcher
+0.062better than expected — took 29% of games against 14% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Jeff Trager / Prakash Kondepudi
2020-11-06 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Matt Webster
0.018below expectation — took 47% of games against 54% expected
7-6, 2-2
W
2020-11-01 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mark McGregor
0.019about as expected — took 63% of games against 67% expected
7-6, 5-1
W
2020-10-31 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mark McGregor
0.046below expectation — took 45% of games against 65% expected
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
Erin Jakotich / Srdjan Jelacicmixed
2020-10-24 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cathy Blankenship
+0.000below expectation — took 20% of games against 28% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2020-10-23 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ignacio Angulo
+0.005about as expected — took 35% of games against 37% expected
6-2, 7-5
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.