← Search

Celine Mende

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Shrewsbury, MA
4.0C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
35 matches · 23W–12L · seasons 2019–2023
Match history35 matches
W
2023-05-31 · NETC:Babygotbackhand:Lovejoy/Welcom · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathy Getchell
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
W
2023-05-24 · NETC:Babygotbackhand:Lovejoy/Welcom · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rebeca Cortazio
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
L
2023-05-17 · NETC:Babygotbackhand:Lovejoy/Welcom · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2023-05-11 · LFNAT:Longfellow Natick:Ebbert · #1 Singles · 4.5
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2023-05-10 · NETC:Babygotbackhand:Lovejoy/Welcom · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathy Getchell
loading the estimate
6-7, 2-0, 0-1
W
2023-03-18 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pamela Jeppson championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
W
2023-02-11 · BTC:Victorious Secret:Jeppson/Leroy · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nora Hannigan
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
L
2023-01-29 · LFW:Longfellow:Kreml/Parrish · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Brian Lomax mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
2023-01-28 · BTC:Victorious Secret:Jeppson/Leroy · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-0, 7-5
W
Sharon Marczewski / Lynn Siebert
2023-01-15 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nora Hannigan championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2022-12-17 · BTC:Victorious Secret:Jeppson/Leroy · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
W
2022-12-04 · MLM:Manchester United:Jeppson/Colson · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Barry Gorman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-0, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2020–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
82.4%
14W–3L · 68.7% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
46.2%
6W–7L · 49.4% of games
9.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
12 matches
#1 Singles
26%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
6 matches
#2 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer